Sunday, August 12, 2007

Super markets in India - boon or bane?

Recently Wal-mart announced its entry into India in partnership with Bharti Enterprises. It was well on the cards for sometime. But still the announcement generated protests in different parts of India by small shop (Mom And Pop - MAP shop) owners. They think that Wal-mart is a big-size, fire-spitting dragon which if let in, will burn all the MAPs. Long term picture may not be very different if these shop owners just hide behind their counters without rekindling their own fire to fight the big guy.

Wal-mart plans to setup 10-15 stores in India by 2015. Each Wal-mart store currently attracts average 4000 visitors per day. If the 15 stores attract 4000 customers from day one, then roughly 60,000 Indians will visit Wal-mart daily or assuming grocery shopping frequency of 2 weeks, around a million customers will visit Wal-mart. Today India has a population of 300 million upper and middle class people or 60-70 million families. By 2015, this number will grow to 100 million if we assume a conservative CAGR of 5%. So even if Wal-mart is building 100% customer base from day one, then it will attract only 1% of India's upper and middle class families.

Entry of super-markets will be good news for those currently working in the retail industry. The current situation for Ramus and Shamus is not very encouraging - 10-12 hours of work every day, no rights, no job securities, no medical insurances or any other perks and all this for meagre salaries of Rs. 2000-3000 per month. In the new super markets, their working conditions will be better, their salaries will be better and their self-esteem will be higher since they will see themselves as part of a big organization. They will have to acquire new skills though to be saleable to these big super markets. There are concerns about those who cannot be retrained because they are illiterate or they are old or they don't have enough money for retraining. The concerns are that they might be left out of the current boom. But the 'complete' transition to super market culture wouldn't happen overnight and may take more than 20-30 years. That is enough time for the current generation of non-saleables to see through their life in the MAPs and not feel any real threats from super markets.

Entry of super-markets will be good news for consumers too who will have more choices, and cheaper goods. There are many products such as processed food which are not available on a large scale in India. Not that they are expensive but the Indian retail industry never provided them, and consumers never demanded them. It might be a chicken and egg problem which we can discuss offline. But the point is that with growing affluence, consumers demand for better brands, for packaged products is increasing and they will see these demands being fulfilled by super markets. It will be super markets that will flourish the retail supply industry in India. So the consumers will not complain the entry of super markets.

It is not necessary that after 20-30 years, there will be no place for MAPs in India. Take Singapore as an example. MAPs coexist in large numbers with super markets such as Carrefours, Giants and Cold Storages. MAPs cater to needs of two types of customers. One type caters to convenience. These MAPs are in the neighbourhood and stock goods that one needs on a more regular basis and saves a trip to the super market in emergency situations. The second type caters to economically lower class of the society, those who are highly price-sensitive and who don't care about shopping experience. MAPs in India can also reposition themselves to better target the evolving customer needs. People like me think that Indian retailers, with their strong business acumen, customer service focus and survival skills, will be rediscovering themselves and will find their own niche.

Even if the recent protests were not against super markets per se but against foreign super markets, giving Wal-mart some tough competition will be Indian super markets such as Reliance, Big Bazaar and numerous local imitations. There is not much to worry. The Wal-marts and Carrefours of the world are not colonising Indian retail industry.

One loser from the super market boom in India will be resource-crunched earth. Natural resources are increasingly becoming rare species and increased demand for consumer goods will quicken the pace. One can just hope and pray that marketers don't entice people into buying aluminium foil, plastic wraps, kitchen towels, etc. and Indians, who are still 'surviving' without such products, find their current practices healthier and don't give in.

I have fond memories of eating ice cream from our local ice cream wala during summer holidays. As the hot summer sun goes down and the evening approaches, ice cream uncle comes on his bicycle. We run to the front door at the sound of his bell, ask him to stop while we convince mom how much we deserve the ice cream. In the meantime, my brother is already waiting for a signal from me to tell the ice cream uncle to put one delicious scoop in each cup. That one scoop of ice cream used to give us so much satisfaction and the experience left so many fond memories. The super markets, with their sophisticated supply chains, get us huge ice cream packs at much lower prices. As a result, one doesn't need to wait for ice cream wala, all you need to do is reach the refrigerator.

But who knows, maybe my ice cream uncle will supply to Wal-mart and I will atleast be able to enjoy the same taste, if not relive the same experience.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

I deny!

Not sure if you ever observed an interesting pattern of 'denial' whenever people in responsible positions are asked about any allegations against them. And it is not just a normal denial. It is always accompanied with conniption fits, with a sense of desperation, with a protest that makes them look like victims. They make it sound as if the biased media is cooking up fantasy stories to show the 'helpless them' in bad light. See below a few such news items from recent press. Note the words highlighted in red.

Families search Pakistan for lost PoWs
For its part, Pakistan denies altogether the presence of Indian military personnel in its jails. But the relatives are not satisfied.

Independent TV channels in Pakistan protest Musharraf decree
Government officials deny the claims of interference. Muhammad Saleem, head of public relations and media at the government agency that regulates the media, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, claimed that the government had nothing to do with the stopping of transmission of news channels. "There is a dispute between the cable operators and media channels," Saleem said. "We have no hand in this. We ourselves don't know what the issues between them are."

Pakistan Denies Troops Traded Gold, Arms With DRC Militia
Chief Pakistani military spokesman Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said the allegations were “preposterous, malicious and baseless.” “

The last one was a BBC investigation report. Probably doesn't matter. Maybe the training of these bureaucrats includes a lesson on "How to deny convincingly" and hence the source of the story, their credibility doesn't really matter. All one has to do is 'deny'. The press and the readers are anyways stupid who will accept what is said and who will completely believe all that is said.

One funny story goes that at a news conference the bureaucrat went on the dias and before the journalist asked a question, he blurted out, "I completely deny!".

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

One drop in the ocean of global emissions!

There is already a lot of talk about global warming, the importance of curbing emissions etc. But a new post from me would be like a drop in the ocean! (Thats how I convince myself whenever I am using my vaccuum cleaner or washing machine, hair dryer or AC - the impact of my using them on global warming is just like a drop in the ocean. How much does it affect it!)

Anyways, my reference point is the article below.


Most of the articles I have read till now talk about how developed countries are more responsible than the developing countries or how developing countries cannot act irresponsibly towards global warming . Everybody is blaming each other! But nobody is talking about what are the steps developed and developing countries can take to curb the emissions. What are the 'practical' steps?

One Option:
Do you want China to stop the factories? But how would the developed world survive? China is not manufacturing just for itself. China's major manufacturing is done for the West. And if China takes steps to improve the quality of its manufacturing to curb emissions, is the West prepared to pay for the increase in product prices? Wouldn't they just shift the manufacturing from China to maybe Africa or wherever it is cheaper?

And maybe then West will start blaming Africa then!

Another option:
Do you want Indians to stop buying cars? Can you force the likes of GMs and Toyotas to manufacture low price hybrid cars and sell only those to Indians? People in India don't care whether they are driving petrol cars or hybrid cars. They have just enough money to buy one. So you provide them hybrid cars at the same price and they will go for it. Can you do that?

One more option:
Do you want to teach the people from developed countries to decrease their usage of electricity? Afterall, electricity & heat accounts for 24.6% of worldwide gas emissions. Residential buildings alone account for 9.9% of worldwide gas emissions and commercial buildings account for another 5.4%. Most of this electricity is probably being consumed in developed countries. We haven't talked about transportation here which contributes 13.5% gas emissions worldwide. Also we are not talking about how the consumer demand for goods and products (which is probably highest in the developed countries) makes industries contribute 10% of the worldwide gas emissions. There is a lot that the general public in developed countries can do. Since most of the population is literate and well educated and understands the implications of global warming, it will be a good start to teach them to decrease their usage of electricity, consumer goods and transportation. That will help decrease emissions from sources that account for 50% of total worldwide emissions!

What is needed is to stop the blame game, and think about 'practical' steps for the whole world to follow to curb emissions. And please don't discuss whether Indians should buy cars or not. That is practially unstoppable unless you stop producing, buying and using cars.